VarSeq for somatic variant analysis

1. Preliminary Setup

2. Data Preparation

3. Project Configuration

4. Variant Calling

  • Select appropriate variant calling algorithm.
  • Load tumor and normal sample data into VarSeq.
  • Configure algorithm parameters as per analysis requirements.
  • Execute the variant calling process.
  • Monitor progress and log any errors.
  • Access the variant call results dashboard.
  • Evaluate quality metrics such as depth, variant allele frequency.
  • Apply filters based on predefined criteria.
  • Select variants that meet quality thresholds.
  • Document rationale for filtering decisions.
  • Choose annotation databases relevant to your study.
  • Load databases into VarSeq if external.
  • Link variants to corresponding annotations.
  • Review annotation results for completeness.
  • Update annotation settings as necessary.
  • Select tumor and normal samples for comparison.
  • Run somatic variant detection algorithms.
  • Review differences between tumor and normal variant calls.
  • Classify variants as somatic based on detection criteria.
  • Export somatic variant results for further analysis.
  • Use alignment tools like BWA or Bowtie.
  • Select the appropriate reference genome version.
  • Adjust parameters for optimal alignment.
  • Check for alignment quality metrics.
  • Visualize alignments using tools like IGV.
  • Calculate average coverage for both samples.
  • Ensure minimum depth thresholds are met.
  • Identify regions with low coverage or gaps.
  • Use tools like GATK DepthOfCoverage.
  • Document coverage statistics for reporting.
  • Analyze the quality metrics of sequencing data.
  • Customize calling parameters such as sensitivity and specificity.
  • Consider tumor purity and ploidy in adjustments.
  • Test different thresholds for variant calling.
  • Review literature for recommended parameter settings.
  • Review variant quality scores and read depth.
  • Filter variants based on quality thresholds.
  • Check for strand bias using allele frequency.
  • Identify potential artifacts using known databases.
  • Generate QC reports for analysis.
  • Combine data from multiple samples for analysis.
  • Use tools like Mutect2 for joint calling.
  • Analyze shared variants across samples.
  • Evaluate batch effects in variant calling.
  • Document findings in a comparative analysis.
  • Cross-reference variants with databases like dbSNP.
  • Apply filters based on allele frequency thresholds.
  • Use tools that incorporate population data for filtering.
  • Generate a list of known germline variants.
  • Ensure filtering criteria are clearly documented.
  • Run multiple variant callers on the same dataset.
  • Create a Venn diagram to visualize overlaps.
  • Analyze discrepancies and concordance rates.
  • Document consensus variants for downstream analysis.
  • Use statistical measures to assess agreement.
  • Create a log of discrepancies with details.
  • Categorize discrepancies by type and impact.
  • Review potential biological explanations.
  • Prepare for further validation or analysis.
  • Include discrepancies in final reports.
  • Include summary statistics and variant lists.
  • Detail methods and parameters used for calling.
  • Provide visual representations of key findings.
  • Ensure clarity and accessibility of report format.
  • Distribute reports to relevant stakeholders.
  • Select appropriate control samples for calibration.
  • Run variant calling algorithms on control data.
  • Adjust algorithm parameters based on control results.
  • Validate performance using known variants.
  • Document calibration process for transparency.

5. Variant Review & Filtering

  • Consult clinical guidelines for relevance.
  • Identify variants associated with specific cancers.
  • Consider patient history and tumor type.
  • Evaluate potential impact on treatment decisions.
  • Set thresholds for allele frequency based on population data.
  • Assess functional annotations from databases.
  • Filter out benign variants based on evidence.
  • Use bioinformatics tools to analyze variant impact.
  • Use secondary analysis tools for confirmation.
  • Cross-reference results with external databases.
  • Confirm variant calls with alternate sequencing methods.
  • Consider using machine learning models for validation.
  • Maintain a detailed record of filtering criteria.
  • Log reasons for variant inclusion or exclusion.
  • Store documentation in a shared database.
  • Ensure clarity for future reviews or audits.
  • Search for variants in each database.
  • Compile information on allele frequency and clinical significance.
  • Check for updates or new findings regularly.
  • Use curated annotations to inform decisions.
  • Analyze variant distribution across samples.
  • Identify subclonal variants and their implications.
  • Consider the impact of heterogeneity on treatment.
  • Use metrics such as variant allele fraction.
  • Compare variant calls between tumor and normal samples.
  • Confirm somatic status through filtering.
  • Use bioinformatics tools for comparison.
  • Document findings in the patient report.
  • Identify variants with established clinical actions.
  • Rank variants based on treatment relevance.
  • Consider clinical trial opportunities for patients.
  • Focus on variants linked to targeted therapies.
  • Schedule meetings to review significant findings.
  • Share insights and interpretations of variants.
  • Discuss potential implications for patient management.
  • Document feedback from clinical experts.
  • Search for recent publications on variants.
  • Summarize findings that may impact patient care.
  • Stay updated on emerging research in oncology.
  • Incorporate relevant literature into reports.
  • Develop a classification system for variants.
  • Assign categories based on clinical guidelines.
  • Document supporting evidence for each category.
  • Review classifications regularly for updates.
  • Search clinical trial registries for relevant studies.
  • Identify novel therapies linked to variants.
  • Compile information on drug targets.
  • Update findings in patient reports.
  • Use visualization tools for comprehensive analysis.
  • Display variant data across genomic landscapes.
  • Highlight significant variants visually.
  • Facilitate discussions with graphical representations.
  • Create a centralized log for tracking variants.
  • Include rationale for each variant decision.
  • Update log continuously with new data.
  • Ensure accessibility for future reviews.

6. Interpretation & Reporting

  • Evaluate each variant against clinical databases.
  • Determine pathogenicity using ACMG guidelines.
  • Consider population frequency data.
  • Assess potential impact on treatment options.
  • Document findings in a clear, concise manner.
  • Create visual representations of variant data.
  • Include graphs, charts, and tables for clarity.
  • Summarize key findings in bullet points.
  • Ensure reports are user-friendly and accessible.
  • Use consistent formatting for readability.
  • Gather detailed family medical histories.
  • Document phenotype observations related to variants.
  • Cite relevant literature and studies.
  • Link findings to clinical context.
  • Incorporate any additional notes or observations.
  • Familiarize with relevant reporting standards.
  • Verify adherence to local and international guidelines.
  • Include required disclaimers and acknowledgments.
  • Maintain confidentiality and data protection.
  • Review reports for compliance before submission.

7. Quality Control & Validation

  • Verify data integrity and completeness.
  • Check for discrepancies in sample identifiers.
  • Ensure proper alignment and variant calling.
  • Assess coverage depth and uniformity.
  • Document any anomalies for further investigation.
  • Select appropriate complementary assays.
  • Design experiments to confirm variant presence.
  • Use different detection methods for validation.
  • Analyze results for consistency with initial data.
  • Report any discrepancies and resolve them.
  • Document analysis protocols and parameters.
  • Re-run analyses with the same dataset.
  • Compare results for consistency and accuracy.
  • Identify any variables that may affect outcomes.
  • Adjust protocols as needed based on findings.
  • Identify colleagues or experts in the field.
  • Prepare a summary of findings and methodologies.
  • Request feedback on analysis and interpretations.
  • Incorporate suggestions to enhance robustness.
  • Document peer review insights for future reference.

8. Post-Analysis Management

Related Checklists